European Stars and Stripes (Newspaper) - June 14, 2007, Darmstadt, Hesse June 2007 stars and stripes Page 19 your Money no overtime pay for Home care workers court ruling could Worsen already High turnover by Pete Yost the associated press Washington Home care workers Are not entitled to overtime pay under fed eral the supreme court ruled this a setback for a growing labor Force of More than 1 million the unanimous decision came in the Case of Evelyn a 73yearold Retiree who spent More than two decades helping the ill and the elderly and is now in failing health the labor depart ment did not exceed its authority when it excluded Home care workers from Over time Protection and courts should defer would if you feel its an easy step into my Lori Reynolds a Home care worker in new York of 40 percent to 60 percent the employees Union government lawyers told the supreme court in april that the goal is ensuring that the elderly who most need Home care service receive it at a reasonable Nancy Duff co president of the National women Law called the decision another blow to Low wage two weeks the court limited workers ability to sue for pay ruling against a Goodyear employee who earned thousands of dollars less than her male counterparts but waited too Long to com half of Home care workers Are Minori to the departments Justice Stephen and 90 percent Are according Breyer relieving employers and an Gering workers rights the Bush administration opposed cokes Challenge to the labor depart ments 1975 a new administration should rewrite it to give workers the Protection they said the service employees International which represents hundreds of thousands of work ers in that the Clinton administration had drafted a regulation to cover the but the Rule was shelved after president Bush took office in Home care aides Are the key to the inde to 2000 census their wages remain among the lowest in the service says the Bureau of labor i would if you feel its an easy step into my said Home care worker Lori Reynolds in new York who said she is truly disappointed by the courts in cokes the supreme court was wrong about what Congress said Harold Craig cokes Lead at the labor department wrote the restrictive regulation after Congress expanded the Laws pendent life senior citizens but Lack paying time and a half for hours in sex of adequate pay is fueling turnover rates Cess of 40 a week would Cost the Home care Industry when you try to apply traditional labor Law to this Home care scenario its really pretty said Paul founder of an firm pro Viding Home health care the Home instead senior has 540 franchises in the United states with Fulland Par time Many seniors need Long hours of com even said if the exemption is eliminated the Cost of service would go so High it would drive Many seniors into the Gray Market where they would be hiring Home care workers there would be no no no supervision and no in new York the annual Cost of the medicaid funded personal care services program would Rise by at least a Quarter of a billion dollars if court Deci Sion is allowed to the City cokes former Long Island care at Home says it would experience tremendous and unsustainable losses if it had to comply with Federal Over time Many Home care workers were brought under the Laws Protection starting with democratic administrations in the in Congress broadened the Law to cover workers in a variety of the subsequent labor department Rule re versed fair labor standards act coverage for Home care workers who previously had the int it asked Justice Ruth Bader that the goal of the 1974 Law was to add yet the government now argues that Congress intended to subtract Evelyn Coke shown in new York in april lost in court monday when the supreme court ruled that Home care work ers Are not entitled to overtime pay under Federal coverage for Home care workers who had previously been covered we think it was Well within the Agency the lawyer for the Federal government re the Case is Long Island care at Home Evelyn tuesdays Market summary indexes 52 High Low name Dow Jones industrials Dow Jones transportation Dow Jones utilities nose composite amex Index Nash a composite Russell 2000 do Wilshire 5000 net Ltd 52wk last chg chg Chi chg nose name vol 00 or More last chg we Stem Pfizer Geneles forum Motorola Tom earn Micron pm cup and inc 492988 332400 312959 308585 276864 265002 261671 242531 240593 227690 amex Nash a most Active name Yokoo or More last chg Spur 2040368 Ishu Knya 1010647 Pru Shouq n 313735 spend 204569 spongy 202239 Onia warn 190362 sell her Spuill ish20tb oils vat 114592 111180 88403 86603 most Active or More name Yokoo last chg push Sqq Sun Micro Intel Microsoft Apple inc Cisco Oracle Al matl qua com Yahoo 1441926 898826 583251 513861 491814 472566 329905 253081 229225 214603 name key defense stocks div be last Armor computer general general Harris Allied l3 Lockheed Rockwell Texas text Ron United key Mutual funds name Nav Ltd ret Fidelity invest Fidelity invest Fidelity spartan Putnam funds a Amer Century inv Fidelity invest Fidelity invest Fidelity invest aim investments a const Frnk a Sec Para aim investments a Charta Fidelity advisor Fidelity advisor Putnam funds a Globe qty Dws Scudder Cis Lull Fidelity advisor Putnam funds a gig a Exchange rates military rates euro costs june Dollar buys june British Pound june japanese yen june South korean won june commercial rates Bahrain British Canada Dollar China Denmark Egypt Hong Hungary Israel Japan Kuwait Norway Philippines Poland saudi Arabia Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey new military Exchange rates Are those available to customers at military Bank ing facilities in the country of issuance for South the Netherlands and the United for no local currency Exchange rates purchasing British pounds in Germa Check with your local military Bank ing commercial rates Are inter Bank rates provided for reference when buying All figures Are foreign currencies to one except for the British which is represented in and the which is precious metals new York it Radom Silver interest rates prime discount Federal funds Market 3month 30year sources the associated Bank of America and sensibility Money tip of the Day estate planning for same sex couples by Marshall Loeb Market watch new York Why is estate planning even More imperative for same sex couples than for straight spouses Gay couples dont have the tax and inherit Ance advantages that marriage says Tanya a Washington lawyer with the firm Bryan so these benefits have to be created through is Tat planning when it comes to estate plan Harvey recommends that Gay families Start by consulting a lawyer on three key issues Power of assigning your partner a Power of attorney for health care is relatively Sim says but it can save you major migraines in the Long most hospitals allow Only family members related by blood or marriage to visit patients in critical if your companion has a Power of it Guaran tees it also gives him or her a voice when decisions have to be the pros and cons of domes tic Many couples Liv ing in states that recognize domes tic partners Are eager to sign but Harvey cautions her clients to consider the potential while Domestic partnerships often convey a variety of inherit employment and tax Bene they Are difficult to dissolve in some disentangling yourself is often As complicated and expensive As traditional i says what happens to your legacy it is essential that each part Ner has a valid if you die without a will providing for your same sex the state deter mines what will happen to your Money and the surviving partner gets Noth says for further information on same sex estate visit or rain
